WolfQuest Community Forum
https://www.wolfquest.org/bb-3.0.10/
https://www.wolfquest.org/bb-3.0.10/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=75064
Ahh, that sounds much easier. I guess I'll just do that if I want to send something so I don't have to fiddle with my emails.alethe wrote:ahem
i send them to neam via pm
Not at all; it is not listed anywhere that this is an acceptable means of art submission (to my knowledge).ForeverEverest wrote:Ahh, that sounds much easier. I guess I'll just do that if I want to send something so I don't have to fiddle with my emails.alethe wrote:ahem
i send them to neam via pm
Apologies if I'm going off-topic.
Anything relating to the pack is allowed to be posted, so yes, discussions about websites regarding individual packs are also allowed. What is not allowed is any discussion pertaining to anything other than the pack itself. This is a forum-wide rule where posts that go off-topic/are irrelevant to the topic are considered as SPAM (unless stated otherwise [i.e. the General Discussion V2 topic]).ForeverEverest wrote:I noticed there have been a few off-topic post problems in pack central. This made me wonder... What's actually allowed in pack threads? For example, are we allowed to discuss a pack's website in the thread, or is it only for welcoming new members and announcing events?
I think it would be nice if there was a new thread in pack central that says what kind of things you're allowed to discuss, just so things are little clearer.
A post is considered SPAM if it does not contribute to or further the conversation, as well as if the post is illegible to read, so posts that only consist of punctuation marks, all caps, text-speak, excessive emojis, symbols, etc. fall into that category. Advertising and double posts are also not allowed.alethe wrote:speaking of the GD, I have another question sort of along the same vein.
To what limit are spam posts allowed there?
One-word posts are an exception to this rule in the General Discussion topic. Since GD does not have a set topic, off-topic posts are not really a concern, unless of course they break one or more of the above rules besides the one-post rule. All in all, the posts should contribute to the conversations taking place.WQ Coordinator wrote: Definition of SPAM
SPAM= Stupid, Pointless, Annoying Messages. Listed below are our definitions of "SPAM":
•Off-topic posts- posts that are irrelevant to the forum or topic
•Repeating answers- replying to questions that have already been answered or copying your previous post(s) and posting them into multiple topics
•Double-posting- replying to topics or posts in succession. (Examples: No-no, acceptable. Please edit previous posts instead of posting more than once.)
•Quoting yourself or another member without adding anything new to the conversation. (Saying "^ this" under a quote is considered SPAM.)
•One-word replies- actually, this includes any posts that are less than three words. If you can reply with less than three words, it's probably not worth saying, so it is not allowed in these forums. There are only a few forums that do permit less than three words, as detailed here- http://wolfquest.org/bb/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=75471.
•Personal topics- anything not directed to all forum members (unless it’s in a pack topic) should be sent using private messages or e-mails.
•Offers for solicitations/services
•Non-normal writing- Text speak (ex- btw I g2g), SHOUTING, unreadable/illegible fonts or using excessive numbers of: smileys :D :) :o :lol: , font colors, or punctuation!!??!??!?!
Fixed the title!valkea wrote:After 8 years, it it perhaps time to rename the What are you known for on WolfQuest thread to something less misleading? As it is now, the title pretty much just tells you who reads and who doesn't, since many users only look at the title and misinterpret it as what are you known for rather than what is the person above you known for.
That'll be a lot of tedious work; as of this post, there are 333,109 accounts (432,394 if counting inactives which is a whole different discussion entirely) in that setting. ^^;duskypack wrote:Perhaps a clearing out of the Newly Registered users? It seems like it would need a periodic clean-out anyway to make sure the users are indeed new and not mostly users who’ve been on for years and haven’t posted.
